Immanent Critique in Thucydides’ Mytilenean Debate and Melian Dialogue
نویسندگان
چکیده
This article investigates social critique in Thucydides’ History of the Peloponnesian War. Two famous Thucydidean episodes are focus: Mytilenean Debate Book III and Melian Dialogue V History. These interpreted here as inquiries assuming shape subversive transformative criticism: immanent critique. Immanent aims at shifting horizons meaning contexts, philosophers practicing this kind criticism understand themselves physicians a failing society. In work, particular object is formed by varying dominant moral ordering principles. Debate, it principle expediency (τò ξύμφορον) that rules, whereas governing normative safety survival (σωτηρíα). each episode, contending perspective introduced for purpose undermining dominating principle.
منابع مشابه
Immanent critique and Islam: Anthropological reflections
This article offers an anthropological outline of immanent critique in Islamic traditions. In addressing the question – what is immanent critique? – it dwells on the interrelationships amongst the Enlightenment’s notion of reason, critique, and Islam. My main contention is that to construe the Western notion of critique derived from Enlightenment’s specific conceptualization of reason as critiq...
متن کاملGenealogy as Immanent Critique: Working from the Inside FORTHCOMING IN ALISON
– only as persons of this conscience do we still feel ourselves related to the German rectitude and piety of millennia, even if as its most questionable and final descendents, we immoralists, we godless ones of today, indeed even in a certain sense as its heirs, as the executors of its innermost will …
متن کاملThucydides and Democratic Peace
Thucydides is an important author for any discussion of the possibilities for an ancient Greek democratic peace. Though democratic peace did not, in fact, seem to function in classical Greece, a number of passages in Thucydides show that an affinity did exist among democratic factions and city-states in the context of hostile competition between democratic and oligarchic regimes. Thucydides rem...
متن کاملDEBATE: Homeopathic treatment of chronic headache: a critique
The author critically reviews a randomised controlled trial by homeopathy for chronic headache and an observational follow-up studyof the same patient cohort.The results showed no di¡erence between homeopathy and placebo. The author believes that theseresultswere a‘falsenegative’due to inadequatehomeopathic treatment, particularly relating to the duration of symptoms and handling of homeopathic...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Critical Horizons
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['1568-5160', '1440-9917']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14409917.2022.2054184